Restore properties after encryption to support them being reused#713
Merged
andreasohlund merged 7 commits intomasterfrom Apr 10, 2026
Merged
Restore properties after encryption to support them being reused#713andreasohlund merged 7 commits intomasterfrom
andreasohlund merged 7 commits intomasterfrom
Conversation
rbev
approved these changes
Apr 8, 2026
rbev
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks good, just the one small question
tmasternak
previously requested changes
Apr 8, 2026
Member
Author
|
@tmasternak changes to the tests are now pushed, please review |
rbev
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 14, 2026
* Restore properties after encryption to support reuse * Switch to new tuple syntax * Better name * Use existing tests instead * Add test to check correctness when sending the same object multiple times * Minimize diff revert EOF changes * Test both supported variants --------- Co-authored-by: Ramon Smits <ramon.smits@gmail.com>
andreasohlund
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 14, 2026
… (#716) * Restore properties after encryption to support reuse * Switch to new tuple syntax * Better name * Use existing tests instead * Add test to check correctness when sending the same object multiple times * Minimize diff revert EOF changes * Test both supported variants --------- Co-authored-by: Andreas Öhlund <andreas.ohlund@particular.net> Co-authored-by: Ramon Smits <ramon.smits@gmail.com>
rbev
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 15, 2026
* Restore properties after encryption to support reuse * Switch to new tuple syntax * Better name * Use existing tests instead * Add test to check correctness when sending the same object multiple times * Minimize diff revert EOF changes * Test both supported variants --------- Co-authored-by: Ramon Smits <ramon.smits@gmail.com>
andreasohlund
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 15, 2026
… (#718) * Restore properties after encryption to support reuse * Switch to new tuple syntax * Better name * Use existing tests instead * Add test to check correctness when sending the same object multiple times * Minimize diff revert EOF changes * Test both supported variants --------- Co-authored-by: Andreas Öhlund <andreas.ohlund@particular.net> Co-authored-by: Ramon Smits <ramon.smits@gmail.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes: