Skip to content

branch-4.1: [fix](iceberg) Use object store path for data location #64028#64042

Merged
yiguolei merged 1 commit into
branch-4.1from
auto-pick-64028-branch-4.1
Jun 3, 2026
Merged

branch-4.1: [fix](iceberg) Use object store path for data location #64028#64042
yiguolei merged 1 commit into
branch-4.1from
auto-pick-64028-branch-4.1

Conversation

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions Bot commented Jun 3, 2026

Cherry-picked from #64028

Problem Summary: Iceberg data location resolution skipped the legacy
object-store.path property and fell back directly to
write.folder-storage.path or table location when write.data.path was not
set. This could choose the wrong data location for tables that still
rely on object-store.path. This change keeps write.data.path as the
highest priority, then checks object-store.path before
write.folder-storage.path and the default table data directory.
@github-actions github-actions Bot requested a review from yiguolei as a code owner June 3, 2026 01:37
@hello-stephen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
Don't know what should be done next? See How to process your PR.

Please clearly describe your PR:

  1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed.
  2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be.
  3. What features were added. Why was this function added?
  4. Which code was refactored and why was this part of the code refactored?
  5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization?

@hello-stephen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

run buildall

@hello-stephen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

FE UT Coverage Report

Increment line coverage 60.00% (3/5) 🎉
Increment coverage report
Complete coverage report

@hello-stephen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

FE Regression Coverage Report

Increment line coverage 0.00% (0/5) 🎉
Increment coverage report
Complete coverage report

@yiguolei yiguolei merged commit 0356689 into branch-4.1 Jun 3, 2026
28 of 30 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants