Add regression test: #10043, backtick should not report unexpected keyword#19476
Add regression test: #10043, backtick should not report unexpected keyword#19476
Conversation
|
|
The backticks cases were added in the previous PRs. It's more interesting to see if there are any |
ea3d696 to
f498636
Compare
Tests that invalid characters in type annotation positions produce clear error messages instead of confusing 'Unexpected reserved keyword': - backtick: FS3563 'This is not a valid identifier' - @: FS0615 'Unexpected infix operator in type expression' Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
f498636 to
e7b6ee5
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
…erge conflict Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
|
Commit pushed:
|
|
🤖 This is an automated response from Regression PR Shepherd. The branch was rebased onto current main this morning to resolve a merge conflict. The CI check is now showing
|
Adds a regression test for #10043
Verifies that
let i:float1 = 3.0` produces FS3563 ("This is not a valid identifier") instead of the previous confusing "Unexpected reserved keyword" message.Fixes #10043