Skip to content

docs: update agent instructions about commit naming in prs#4946

Open
PavelSafronov wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
agents-commit-update
Open

docs: update agent instructions about commit naming in prs#4946
PavelSafronov wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
agents-commit-update

Conversation

@PavelSafronov
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

Summary of Changes

Update agent instructions for naming convention, specifically the names of PR commits. This update ensures that agents don't complain about naming "issues" in PRs, since we squash commits.

What is the motivation for this change?

Agents complain about things that don't matter: commit messages in PRs.

Double check the following

  • Lint is passing (npm run check:lint)
  • Self-review completed using the steps outlined here
  • PR title follows the correct format: type(NODE-xxxx)[!]: description
    • Example: feat(NODE-1234)!: rewriting everything in coffeescript
  • Changes are covered by tests
  • New TODOs have a related JIRA ticket

@PavelSafronov PavelSafronov marked this pull request as ready for review May 26, 2026 16:51
@PavelSafronov PavelSafronov requested a review from a team as a code owner May 26, 2026 16:51
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings May 26, 2026 16:51
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Updates contributor/agent guidance to avoid unnecessary feedback about commit-message naming inside PR branches by clarifying that this repo uses squash merges and the PR title becomes the final main commit message.

Changes:

  • Clarifies that PRs are squash-merged and only the PR title must follow the commit message convention
  • Updates wording to specify the PR title Conventional Commits format used for the squash-merge commit

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants