Fix another vm_interrupt bug for tailcall VM#22265
Closed
morrisonlevi wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
Conversation
iluuu1994
approved these changes
Jun 10, 2026
iluuu1994
left a comment
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Haven't spent too much time with the tailcall VM but the fix looks correct to me.
Contributor
Author
|
Thanks for the review, I'll wait for @bwoebi to review as well before merging. |
vm_interrupt bug for tailcall VM
c1599b5 to
dc16589
Compare
morrisonlevi
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 11, 2026
* PHP-8.5: Fix another vm_interrupt bug for tailcall VM (#22265)
Contributor
Author
|
Merged and closed by 05c7b00. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We fixed a bug in the tailcall VM related to vm_interrupt in 8.5.7: #21922. Unfortunately I was able to find another crash, reproducer attached.
Note that the "return opline" variant that Arnaud benchmarked passes this test. This PR instead adds a
SAVE_OPLINEbeforeZEND_VM_LOOP_INTERRUPTin a specific macro. They seemed very close in speed, and @bwoebi preferred this to partially reverting.