Benchmarks Website Version 3 #7643
Merged
CodSpeed HQ / CodSpeed Performance Analysis
failed
May 4, 2026 in 0s
Performance Regression: -26.23%
⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected
Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.
For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.
⚡ 5 improved benchmarks
❌ 3 regressed benchmarks
✅ 1161 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 138 skipped benchmarks1
⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.
Performance Changes
| Mode | Benchmark | BASE |
HEAD |
Efficiency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ⚡ | Simulation | patched_take_10k_first_chunk_only |
302.4 µs | 272 µs | +11.2% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | take_10k_dispersed |
284.8 µs | 239.7 µs | +18.8% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | patched_take_10k_adversarial |
259 µs | 228.6 µs | +13.32% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | patched_take_10k_dispersed |
316 µs | 285.5 µs | +10.69% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | take_10k_first_chunk_only |
270.8 µs | 225.8 µs | +19.92% |
| ❌ | Simulation | bitwise_not_vortex_buffer_mut[1024] |
307.8 ns | 366.1 ns | -15.93% |
| ❌ | Simulation | bitwise_not_vortex_buffer_mut[2048] |
371.4 ns | 429.7 ns | -13.57% |
| ❌ | Simulation | bitwise_not_vortex_buffer_mut[128] |
246.1 ns | 333.6 ns | -26.23% |
Comparing ct/benchmarks-v3 (fbb0b39) with develop (d3ff1f1)
Footnotes
-
138 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩
Loading